Friday, 15 January 2010, 12:23
S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 03 COLOMBO 000032
SIPDIS
DEPARTMENT FOR SCA/INSB
EO 12958 DECL: 01/15/2020
TAGS PGOV, PREL, PREF, PHUM, PTER, EAID, MOPS, CE
SUBJECT: SRI LANKA WAR-CRIMES ACCOUNTABILITY: THE TAMIL 
PERSPECTIVE
REF: A. 09 COLOMBO 1180  B. COLOMBO 8
COLOMBO 00000032 001.2 OF 003
Classified By: AMBASSADOR PATRICIA A. BUTENIS. REASONS: 1.4 (B, D)
                                                                  Summary
   -               US ambassador to Colombo said that the main reason there  will not be a Sri Lankan enquiries into the mass killings that marked  the end of the war with the Tamil Tigers last year was that President  Mahinda Rajapaksa, bears much of the responsibility, along with his  government, generals and some of his family. Key passage highlighted in  yellow.
 
 
-               Read related article        
          1. (S) SUMMARY: There have been a few tentative steps on  accountability for crimes allegedly committed by Sri Lankan troops and  civilian officials during the war with the LTTE. President Rajapaksa  named a committee to make recommendations to him on the U.S. incidents  report by April, and candidate Fonseka has discussed privately the  formation of some form of "truth and reconciliation" commission.  Otherwise, accountability has not been a high-profile issue -- including  for Tamils in Sri Lanka. While Tamils have told us they would like to  see some form of accountability, they have been pragmatic in what they  can expect and have focused instead on securing greater rights and  freedoms, resolving the IDP question, and improving economic prospects  in the war-ravaged and former LTTE-occupied areas. Indeed, while they  wanted to keep the issue alive for possible future action, Tamil  politicians with whom we spoke in Colombo, Jaffna, and elsewhere said  now was not time and that pushing hard on the issue would make them  "vulnerable." END SUMMARY.
ACCOUNTABILITY AS A POLITICAL ISSUE
-----------------------------------
2.  (S) Accountability for alleged crimes committed by GSL troops and  officials during the war is the most difficult issue on our bilateral  agenda. (NOTE: Both the State Department Report to Congress on Incidents  during the Conflict and the widely read report by the University  Teachers for Human Rights (Jaffna) also detailed many incidents of  alleged crimes perpetrated by the LTTE. Most of the LTTE leadership was  killed at the end of the war, leaving few to be held responsible for  those crimes. The Government of Sri Lanka (GSL) is holding thousands of  mid- and lower-level ex-LTTE combatants for future rehabilitation and/or  criminal prosecution. It is unclear whether any such prosecutions will  meet international standards. END NOTE.) There have been some tentative  steps on accountability on the GSL side. Soon after the appearance of  the State Department report, President Rajapaksa announced the formation  of an experts' committee to examine the report and to provide him with  recommendations on dealing with the allegations. At the end of the year,  the president extended the deadline for the committee's recommendations  from December 31 until April. For his part, General Fonseka has spoken  publicly of the need for a new deal with the Tamils and other  minorities. Privately, his campaign manager told the Ambassador that  Fonseka had ordered the opposition campaign to begin work planning a  "truth and reconciliation" commission (ref B).
3. (S) These  tentative steps notwithstanding, accountability has not been a  high-profile issue in the presidential election -- other than President  Rajapaksa's promises personally to stand up to any international power  or body that would try to prosecute Sri Lankan war heroes. While  regrettable, the lack of attention to accountability is not surprising. There  are no examples we know of a regime undertaking wholesale  investigations of its own troops or senior officials for war crimes  while that regime or government remained in power. In Sri Lanka this is  further complicated by the fact that responsibility for many of the  alleged crimes rests with the country's senior civilian and military  leadership, including President Rajapaksa and his brothers and  opposition candidate General Fonseka.
THE TAMIL PERSPECTIVE
---------------------
COLOMBO 00000032 002.2 OF 003
4.  (S) For different reasons, of course, accountability also has not been a  top priority for most Tamils in Sri Lanka. While Tamils have told us  they would like to see some form of accountability, they have been  pragmatic in what they can expect and have focused instead on securing  greater rights and freedoms, resolving the IDP question, and improving  economic prospects in the war-ravaged and former LTTE-occupied areas.  Indeed, while they wanted to keep the issue alive for possible future  action, Tamil leaders with whom we spoke in Colombo, Jaffna, and  elsewhere said now was not time and that pushing hard on the issue would  make them "vulnerable."
5. (S) The one prominent Tamil who has spoken publicly on the issue is Tamil National Alliance (TNA) MP,  self-proclaimed presidential candidate, and Prabhakaran relative M.K.  Sivajilingam. Breaking from both the TNA mainstream and the  pro-government Tamil groups, he launched his campaign because he  believed neither the government nor the opposition was adequately  addressing Tamil issues. Sivajilingam has focused on creating a  de-centralized federal structure in Sri Lanka with separate prime  ministers for the Sinhalese and Tamils, but he also has spoken about  accountability, demanding an international inquiry to get justice for  the deaths and suffering of the Tamil people.
6. (S) Other Tamil  politicians have not made public statements on accountability and are  generally more pragmatic in their thinking. In our multiple recent  discussions with TNA leader R. Sampanthan, he said he believed  accountability was important and he welcomed the international  community's -- especially the diaspora's -- interest in the issue. But  Sampanthan was realistic about the dim prospects for any Sri Lankan  government to take up the issue. Granting that governments in power do  not investigate their own, Sampanthan nevertheless said it was important  to the health of the nation to get the truth out. While he believed the  Tamil community was "vulnerable" on the issue and said he would not  discuss "war crimes" per se in parliament for fear of retaliation,  Sampanthan would emphasize the importance of people knowing the truth  about what happened during the war. We also have asked Sampanthan  repeatedly for his ideas on an accountability mechanism that would be  credible to Tamils and possible within the current political context,  but he has not been able to provide such a model.
7. (S) Mano Ganesan, MP  and leader of the ethnic Tamil Democratic People's Front (DPF), is a  Colombo-based Tamil who counts as supporters many of the well-educated,  long-term Colombo and Western Province resident Tamils, and was an early  supporter of Fonseka. The general made promises that convinced him that  if Fonseka were to win, ethnic reconciliation issues would then be  decided by parliament, not the Executive President. On accountability,  Ganesan told us that while the issue was significant XXXXXXXXXXXX  accountability was a divisive issue and the focus now had to be on  uniting to rid the country of the Rajapaksas.
8. (S) TNA MP  Pathmini Sithamparanathan told us in mid-December that the true story  of what happened in the final weeks of the war would not go away and  would come out eventually, but she also said now was not the time for  war crimes-type investigations. Finally, on a recent trip to Jaffna,  PolOff found that local politicians did not raise accountability for  events at the end of the war as an issue of immediate concern, focusing  instead on current bread-and-butter issues, such as IDP releases,  concerns about Sinhala emigration to traditional Tamil regions, and
COLOMBO 00000032 003.2 OF 003
re-developing the local economy.
COMMENT
-------
9.  (S) Accountability is clearly an issue of importance for the ultimate  political and moral health of Sri Lankan society. There is an obvious  split, however, between the Tamil diaspora and Tamils in Sri Lanka on  how and when to address the issue. While we understand the former would  like to see the issue as an immediate top-priority issue, most Tamils in  Sri Lanka appear to think it is both unrealistic and counter-productive  to push the issue too aggressively now. While Tamil leaders are very  vocal and committed to national reconciliation and creating a political  system more equitable to all ethnic communities, they believe themselves  vulnerable to political or even physical attack if they raise the issue  of accountability publicly, and common Tamils appear focused on more  immediate economic and social concerns. A few have suggested to us that  while they cannot address the issue, they would like to see the  international community push it. Such an approach, however, would seem  to play into the super-heated campaign rhetoric of Rajapaksa and his  allies that there is an international conspiracy against Sri Lanka and  its "war heroes." BUTENIS
source: the guardian uk